Tesla Robotaxi Pilot Data Reveals 4 Crashes in 402,300 km

Published on 31 Oct, 2025, 7:05 AM IST
Updated on 31 Oct, 2025, 7:08 AM IST
Acko Drive Team
ReadTimeIcon
2 min read
Top stories and News
Follow us onfollow-google-news-icon

Share Post

tesla_robotaxi_fd6822e379.webp

New data reveals that the Tesla Robotaxi Austin pilot has logged 402,300 km with 4 crashes (1 per 100,584 km) under passenger-seat monitor.

As automated driving advances, government oversight of vehicle incidents is evolving. Tesla’s Robotaxi pilot in Austin has triggered new reporting requirements under the US NHTSA’s Standing General Order, shifting from Level 2 to higher autonomy classification.

Shift to Passenger-Seat Supervision

Tesla previously reported crashes linked to its Level 2 driver-assistance system, requiring constant human attention. For the Austin Robotaxi programme, launched in late June, the company moved the safety monitor from driver to passenger seat. 

This change qualified the service for elevated automated driving status, mandating detailed crash disclosures to regulators.

Early Safety Data from Austin Fleet

Since operations began, the Robotaxi fleet has logged 402,300 km. Tesla reported four incidents to NHTSA: three in July and one in September. This translates to a crash roughly every 100,584 km. Each journey included a human monitor with immediate override capability via a kill switch.

The September incident involved collision with a fixed object, such as a pillar or barrier, in a parking lot, causing only property damage. Tesla provides limited details on crash circumstances, unlike many competitors, hindering public and expert analysis.

Comparison with Waymo’s Driverless Operations

Waymo, operating fully driverless vehicles without onboard monitors, offers a benchmark. Its fleet has covered over 125 million miles globally, reporting 1,267 crashes, one every 158,682 km. 

This lower frequency highlights a stark contrast with Tesla’s monitored Robotaxi rate of one crash per approximately 100,584 km.

Unanswered Questions on Interventions

A critical gap remains: Tesla has not disclosed how often human monitors intervened to prevent potential crashes. Without this data, assessing the system’s independent safety performance is challenging. Public understanding relies on mandatory regulatory filings and Tesla’s selective releases.

The Austin pilot provides initial insights into robotaxi safety under supervised autonomy. As programmes expand, transparency on interventions and incident details will be key to building trust and informing policy.

Also read: MG Motor Expands PM 2.5 Air Filters Across All Models Amid Rising Festive Season Pollution

AckoDriveTag IconTags
Tesla

Looking for a new car?

We promise the best car deals and earliest delivery!

Callback Widget Desktop Icon